++ 0% (Reading text)
++ 5% (Analysing sentences)
++ 15% (Drawing inferences)
++ 20% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 23% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 26% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 29% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 32% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 35% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 38% (Binding rulebooks)
++ 41% (Generating code)
You wrote 'repeat with item running through the list of telephones' telephones it by leonardo
boselli: but this describes a collection of
values which can't be repeated through, because the possible range is too
large (or has no sensible ordering). For instance, you can 'repeat with D
running through doors' because there are only a small number of doors and
they can be put in order of creation. But you can't 'repeat with N running
through numbers' because numbers are without end.
In the sentence 'if the calling number of the item is the number
understood'
(Leonardo Boselli/Telephones IT.i7x, line 24),
you seem to be looking up the 'calling number' property, but 'list of k' is
not allowed to have that property.
I was trying to match this phrase:
if (calling number of the item is the number understood - a
condition):
I recognised:
calling number of the item is the number understood = a condition
In the sentence 'now the line dialled is the item' telephones it by leonardo
boselli, it looks as if you intend 'the line
dialled is the item' to be a condition, but that would mean comparing two
kinds of value which cannot mix - an object and a list of telephones - so
this must be incorrect.
++ 44% (Generating code)
In the line 'say "(prima interrompi la comunicazione [...] yer])[command
clarification break]"' telephones it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'conp the other
party of the player' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like
any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'conp the other party of
the player' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but
couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because
punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or
full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line 'say "(prima interrompi la comunicazione [...] yer])[command
clarification break]"' telephones it by leonardo
boselli, I was expecting that 'conp the other
party of the player' would be something to 'say', but it didn't look like
any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried to read 'conp the other party of
the player' as a value of some kind (because it's legal to say values), but
couldn't make sense of it that way either. Sometimes this happens because
punctuation has gone wrong - for instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or
full stop at the end of the 'say' phrase.
In the line 'say "Puoi sentire il respiro [dip the other party of the
player]."'
(Leonardo Boselli/Telephones IT.i7x, line 49),
I was expecting that 'dip the other party of the player' would be something
to 'say', but it didn't look like any form of 'say' that I know. So I tried
to read 'dip the other party of the player' as a value of some kind
(because it's legal to say values), but couldn't make sense of it that way
either. Sometimes this happens because punctuation has gone wrong - for
instance, if you've omitted a semicolon or full stop at the end of the
'say' phrase.
++ 47% (Generating code)
++ 50% (Generating code)
++ 53% (Generating code)
++ 56% (Generating code)
++ 59% (Generating code)
++ 62% (Generating code)
++ 65% (Generating code)
++ 68% (Generating code)
++ 71% (Generating code)
++ 74% (Generating code)
++ 77% (Generating code)
++ 80% (Generating code)
++ 83% (Generating code)
++ 86% (Generating code)
++ 89% (Generating code)
++ Ended: Translation failed: 6 problems found